Skip to main content

The Following People Contributed to This Page

Loyda Gomez
Written byLoyda GomezParalegal & Office ManagerB.A.Sc., Political Science & Government, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), 22+ years at The Orlow Firm, Bilingual: English and Spanish

Updated: July 12, 2026 · 11 min read

What is loss of consortium? It is a legal claim that lets a legally married spouse seek compensation when their partner suffers a serious injury that damages the marriage. Under New York law, it covers lost companionship, intimacy, household services, and emotional support. The claim is derivative. It travels with the injured spouse's personal injury lawsuit.

When a serious accident strikes a New York family, the financial toll shows up on medical bills and lost paychecks. But there is another kind of loss that no invoice captures. The partner who once shared the cooking and the conversation, who was a steady source of affection and support, is suddenly diminished or gone from daily life. New York law recognizes that harm. The uninjured spouse can bring a loss of consortium claim for it. In many cases that claim adds real value to the family's overall recovery. Even so, families routinely overlook it. This article explains what loss of consortium means, who can bring the claim, what it covers, how it is valued, and the deadlines that apply.

Where Loss of Consortium Claims Come From in New York

The modern New York rule traces back to Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co., 22 N.Y.2d 498 (1968). In that case, the New York Court of Appeals recognized a wife's right to recover for the loss of her husband's consortium after he was severely injured. The court described consortium as the conjugal fellowship of husband and wife: the love, companionship, affection, society, sexual relations, and solace that flow from the marriage.

That definition is still the foundation today, and it applies equally to both spouses. The injury to one partner becomes the basis for a loss of consortium claim by the other.

What Exactly Is Included in "Consortium"?

Courts and lawyers generally sort the consortium that Millington described into three categories. Understanding them helps explain why these claims are about far more than household chores.

  • Loss of services. These are the practical, day-to-day contributions the injured spouse can no longer make: cooking, cleaning, home repairs, yard work, childcare, grocery shopping, and similar tasks. The household now has to pay for that help or go without it. So this category has a measurable economic value.
  • Loss of support. This covers the financial and material contributions the injured spouse provided to the marriage. It is related to, but separate from, the lost-wages claim in the underlying injury case, which belongs to the injured person.
  • Loss of marital relations. These are the intangible losses at the heart of a marriage: companionship, intimacy, emotional support, affection, and society. They are the hardest to put a number on. Yet they are often the most significant part of the claim.

A loss of consortium claim in New York can draw on all three categories. The more the injury reshapes the marriage itself, the stronger the claim tends to be.

Who Can File a Loss of Consortium Claim in New York?

Only a legally married spouse can bring a loss of consortium claim in New York. This is the single most misunderstood part of the law, so it is worth stating plainly. Domestic partners, fiancés, long-term companions, and unmarried couples who live together do not qualify. That stays true no matter how committed or long the relationship.

New York abolished common-law marriage on April 29, 1933. A couple cannot become "married" simply by living together for years and presenting themselves as spouses. The marriage has to be a legal one.

The eligibility limits do not end with marital status. New York has declined to extend consortium rights beyond spouses. A child cannot bring a consortium claim for an injured parent. A parent cannot bring one for an injured adult child. Siblings have no such claim either. New York courts have specifically rejected efforts to expand the doctrine to children.

Two more points matter. First, the claim belongs to the uninjured spouse, not to the injured person. It is the spouse's own, independent (though derivative) cause of action. Second, the couple must have been married at the time of the injury, not merely married by the time the lawsuit is filed. A marriage that comes after the accident does not create a consortium claim for an injury that came first.

Why the Derivative Nature of the Claim Matters

A loss of consortium claim is what the law calls a derivative claim. That means it depends on the injured spouse's underlying personal injury case. The consortium claim has no independent footing. It rises and falls with the main lawsuit.

In practice, this has several consequences that families should understand from the start:

  • The consortium claim is brought together with the underlying injury case, in the same lawsuit. It is not a separate action filed on its own.
  • If the injured spouse cannot prove the defendant was negligent, the consortium claim fails along with the main claim.
  • If the injured spouse's case is dismissed, or the injured spouse settles and releases their claim, the consortium claim is generally wiped out too.

There is an important upside, though. New York does not cap non-economic damages in personal injury cases, and loss of consortium falls into that category. A consortium award is not limited by any statutory ceiling. Its size is governed by the evidence, not an arbitrary maximum.

Shared fault still applies. Under New York's comparative negligence rule, if the injured spouse is found partly responsible for the accident, the consortium award is reduced in the same proportion. (CPLR § 1411) Say the injured spouse is found 30 percent at fault. The consortium recovery is then reduced by 30 percent as well.

New York Car Accident Law: What Can You Be Compensated For?
What's in this video?

This video explains what types of compensation are available in a New York car accident case, including economic damages (medical bills, lost wages) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering). It provides useful context for understanding loss of consortium as one of the non-economic damage categories a family can recover after a serious accident.

How Are Loss of Consortium Damages Calculated?

There is no formula. Unlike a medical bill or a lost paycheck, loss of consortium damages cannot be added up on a calculator. A jury weighs the evidence and makes a judgment about what the loss is worth.

In reaching that number, juries typically consider:

  • The severity and permanence of the injured spouse's injuries
  • The quality and closeness of the couple's relationship before the accident
  • How daily life and the division of responsibilities have changed since the injury
  • The extent of physical limitations and the prognosis for recovery
  • How much intimacy, companionship, and emotional support have been affected

Awards range widely. They run from a few thousand dollars for short-lived disruptions to several million dollars in cases involving catastrophic, permanent injuries. Some lawyers use a rough rule of thumb that a consortium award lands near 10 percent of the primary injury award. That is a loose estimate, not a rule of law. Every case turns on its own facts.

Because the loss is so personal, the proof tends to be personal too. Medical records establish the nature and permanence of the injury. Testimony from both spouses describes how the relationship has changed in concrete, lived terms. Expert testimony on the long-term impact of the injury often rounds out the picture.

What Injuries Tend to Support a Loss of Consortium Claim?

Not every injury supports a viable consortium claim. The injury has to meaningfully alter the marriage, not merely cause temporary inconvenience. As a general matter, the claims that succeed involve serious injuries with long-term or permanent effects.

Catastrophic injuries are the clearest examples. A traumatic brain injury can change personality, memory, and cognition. It can transform who a person is, not just what they can do. Spinal cord injuries and paralysis, severe burns, amputations, and disabling chronic pain can all reshape a marriage in ways that last for years or for good. The common thread is that the injury changes the relationship itself, deeply and lastingly. Temporary injuries that heal, even painful ones, rarely support a consortium claim.

These injuries arise across the kinds of cases New York personal injury firms handle every day. They include motor vehicle collisions involving cars, trucks, and motorcycles; construction accidents such as scaffold falls and equipment failures; slip-and-fall and other premises liability incidents; medical malpractice; defective products; and dog bites and animal attacks.

Statute of Limitations for Loss of Consortium in New York

Because a consortium claim is derivative, it generally runs on the same clock as the underlying injury case.

For most personal injury cases, the deadline is three years from the date of the injury under New York's general personal injury statute of limitations, the deadline to file your lawsuit. (CPLR § 214) When the underlying claim is for medical malpractice, a shorter period applies. It is two and a half years from the malpractice, or from the end of continuous treatment for the same condition. (CPLR § 214-a) Missing the deadline bars the claim permanently, so the safe course is to act early rather than wait.

One exception is critical and often misunderstood: loss of consortium is not available in a New York wrongful death case. When a spouse dies, New York's wrongful death statute governs. It limits recovery to the pecuniary, or economic, losses suffered by the surviving family. (EPTL § 5-4.3) The New York Court of Appeals confirmed this in Liff v. Schildkrout, 49 N.Y.2d 622 (1980). A surviving spouse cannot recover for loss of consortium in a wrongful death action. It is a painful and counterintuitive rule. A spouse who is gravely injured can support a consortium claim, but a spouse who dies cannot, because the law channels that situation into the wrongful death statute instead.

What is a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in New York?
What's in this video?

This video explains what a wrongful death lawsuit is in New York, who can bring one, and what damages are available. It directly complements the section above: loss of consortium is not available in a wrongful death action, and this video helps readers understand how wrongful death cases work and why the rules differ from standard personal injury cases.

Related Questions

Does loss of consortium apply to domestic partners or unmarried couples in New York?

No. New York limits loss of consortium to legally married spouses. Domestic partners, fiancés, and unmarried couples cannot bring the claim. And because New York abolished common-law marriage in 1933, living together for many years does not create a qualifying marriage, no matter how long or committed the relationship.

Can children file a loss of consortium claim for an injured parent in New York?

No. New York has declined to extend consortium rights to children. A child cannot recover for the loss of an injured parent's care, guidance, or companionship. The same limit applies to parents of injured adult children and to siblings. The claim is reserved for legally married spouses only.

How do you prove loss of consortium in New York?

Proving a loss of consortium claim in New York requires two things. First, medical evidence of how severe and permanent the injury is. Second, personal testimony from both spouses describing how the relationship changed in concrete terms: lost help, lost companionship, lost intimacy. Expert testimony on long-term effects often supports the claim. Credible, specific testimony carries significant weight.

Does comparative negligence affect a loss of consortium claim?

Yes. Because the claim is derivative, any fault assigned to the injured spouse reduces the consortium award by the same percentage under New York's comparative negligence rule. If the injured spouse is found 25 percent responsible for the accident, the loss of consortium recovery is reduced by 25 percent.


Sources & Official Resources

New York Laws Cited

  1. CPLR § 1411 — Comparative Negligence
  2. CPLR § 214 — Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury (Three Years)
  3. CPLR § 214-a — Statute of Limitations for Medical Malpractice (Two and a Half Years)
  4. EPTL § 5-4.3 — Wrongful Death: Amount of Recovery (Pecuniary Losses)

Official Court Resources 5. NY Courts — Ask a Law Librarian: Common Law Marriage in New York


Contact The Orlow Firm

If your spouse was seriously injured in an accident, you may have a loss of consortium claim that adds meaningful value to your family's overall case. Because the claim is derivative, it has to be filed correctly alongside the underlying personal injury lawsuit, and it is governed by the same deadlines. Understanding your options early matters. The Orlow Firm has represented injured people and their families throughout Queens and across New York City since 1982, more than 40 years.

Call (646) 647-3398 for a free consultation. We work on contingency. You pay nothing unless we win.

Se Habla Español

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Every case is different. Contact an attorney to discuss your specific situation.

The Following People Contributed to This Page

Loyda Gomez
Written byParalegal & Office ManagerB.A.Sc., Political Science & Government, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), 22+ years at The Orlow Firm, Bilingual: English and Spanish

Related Articles

Legal Glossary

What Is a Serious Injury in New York?

In New York, a "serious injury" is a legal term defined by Insurance Law § 5102(d). It covers nine specific categories. Those are death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, fracture, loss of a…

Read More

The Orlow Firm’s Results

Notable settlements and verdicts for our clients

$5,000,000

Infant Lead Poisoning - Foster Home

Infant placed in foster home with lead paint developed extremely elevated blood lead levels causing neurological problems.

Lead Poisoning
1 of 14

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Customer reviews on Google

4.9 rating of 59 reviews
Payton Hutchinson

Payton Hutchinson

3 months ago

All my homies love brian and adam! 10/10 recommend for an amazing turnout on your case

Andrew Gantman

Andrew Gantman

5 months ago

Brian and his team made The whole process very easy This is the only law firm I will use

Aiaja Blackwell

Aiaja Blackwell

5 months ago

This Law Firm is 10/10! The staff and most of all the attorney Brian Orlow was very nice, sweet and amazing to work with. They answered all of my questions and handled me with respect and care! If you’re looking for a la…

Maegan Ratliff (maedwellness)

Maegan Ratliff (maedwellness)

a year ago

This firm is top! Everyone is professional, and they actually care. It is a rare combination, but The Orlow Firm has managed to achieve it. They made all the potentially difficult moments easy, and they were always direc…

Michael Foster

Michael Foster

a year ago

They provided me with excellent service.

Christa

Christa

2 years ago

Brian was very helpful when my partner and I got into an accident. He not only guided us through the legal proceedings of the case, but he assisted in referring me to a convenient physical therapist in my area. Accidents…

Miguel Alava

Miguel Alava

2 years ago

The Orlow Firm is the Greatest, most professional law firm in all of New York City and the World. Brian really cares about his clients. He still sends me Birthday Cards yearly after my first case which was 10 years ago…

Kamal Ali

Kamal Ali

2 years ago

Great job. Appreciate your help. Thanks...

matt spiller

matt spiller

2 years ago

Very Professional office , reached a very nice settlement in a short period of time , kept me in the loop during the process. Would highly recommend .

Mirely Nunez

Mirely Nunez

2 years ago

"The process was so easy and the outcome awesome!"

Amira Givens

Amira Givens

2 years ago

This law firm took the time to help me When no one else would . I’m so grateful to them . I recommend them to everyone.

Nichelle B

Nichelle B

3 years ago

Brain was amazing from the start. The process was so easy and the outcome awesome! I had two cases at one time and he handled both. You will be happy to use this office. Professional and curious through and through.

Tanisha Stewart

Tanisha Stewart

3 years ago

So far The Orlow Firm had been the best. On top of everything thing. Thank you for working with me.

DiAnitap. M

DiAnitap. M

4 years ago

Muy excelentes abogados

John Hage

John Hage

5 years ago

Yes I was very impressed with the professionalism and the quality of work done by the Orlow law firm. Especially thanks to Brian and his brother for all the hard work.

David Wilson

David Wilson

8 years ago

I was involved in an accident that left me injured. I wasn't sure what I needed to do so I started Googling around and ended up finding The Orlow Firm. I couldn't be happier with my decision to work with Brian and everyo…

Memberships & Accolades

The Orlow Firm’s Accolades

Founded in 1981, The Orlow Firm has earned many top-level honors for its excellence, compassion, and legal excellence. These recognitions reflect our unwavering commitment to achieving justice, delivering results, and providing compassionate, personalized representation to injury victims in Queens and throughout New York City.

Lawyers.com
Super Lawyers
Justia
Martindale-Hubbell AV Rated
Our Locations

Four offices across New York City.

We offer free initial consultations and operate four offices across New York City for your convenience. We can go to you if you cannot come to us.

We can help you! Request a free consultation.

Contact Us Today

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
Notice: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The Orlow Firm works on a contingent fee basis. A contingent basis means that our attorneys do not charge by consultation but will take a percentage on the amount recovered. This amount is usually one third of the net recovery after disbursement. This means that the cost of hiring The Orlow Firm varies based on the amount recovered.

© 2026 by The Orlow Firm. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms & Conditions.