Skip to main content

Can You Sue a Property Owner for a Personal Injury in New York?

Call Now to Request a Free Consultation (646) 647-3398

The Following People Contributed to This Page

Loyda Gomez
Written byLoyda GomezParalegal & Office ManagerB.A.Sc., Political Science & Government, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), 22+ years at The Orlow Firm, Bilingual: English and Spanish
Adam Orlow
Legally reviewed byAdam OrlowSenior Trial PartnerFormer Queens County Bar Association President (2022–2023)

Updated: July 12, 2026 · 15 min read

Yes. In New York, you can sue a property owner for a personal injury if their negligence caused you harm. You must show they owed you a duty of care. You must also show they failed to fix or warn about a dangerous condition, and that this failure directly caused your injury. New York law gives most injured visitors three years to file.

That short answer holds true whether you were hurt in a grocery store, an apartment building hallway, a parking garage, or on a cracked city sidewalk. But the full picture is more involved. Who can be held responsible isn't always obvious. The deadlines shift dramatically when a government agency is involved, and the evidence that decides these cases often disappears within days. At The Orlow Firm, we've handled premises liability claims throughout Queens and New York City since 1982. The questions below are the ones injured people ask us first.

What Is Premises Liability in New York?

Premises liability is the area of law that governs injuries caused by dangerous conditions on someone else's property. It applies broadly. It covers stores, restaurants, apartment buildings, private homes, office buildings, construction sites, parking lots, and public sidewalks. If a hazardous condition on a property injures you, premises liability law is what determines whether the person responsible for that property has to pay.

New York uses a single standard for these cases. Under the landmark decision in Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233 (1976), property owners and others who control land must act with reasonable care under the circumstances to keep the property safe. To decide whether someone met that standard, courts weigh three things. They look at how foreseeable it was that someone would be harmed, how serious the potential injury was, and how much burden it would have taken to prevent the danger.

Before Basso, New York sorted visitors into rigid categories: invitee, licensee, or trespasser. The duty owed depended on which box you fell into. Basso eliminated those tiers. The reason you were on the property still matters as a factor in the reasonable-care analysis. But it's no longer a rigid cutoff that decides your case at the door. The main exception is trespassers, who still receive only limited protection. There's a special rule for children that we cover below.

Who Can Be Sued for a Property Injury in New York?

One of the most common misconceptions is that only the person whose name is on the deed can be held responsible. In reality, several parties may share liability, and identifying all of them is often what makes the difference between a partial recovery and a full one.

  • The property owner is the most common defendant. They have a duty to maintain safe conditions on the property they own.
  • A landlord can be liable for injuries in common areas like hallways, stairwells, lobbies, and elevators, even when they don't live in or occupy the building. A landlord may also be responsible for a dangerous condition inside a rented unit. This applies if they kept control over that area, or if they knew about the defect and failed to address it.
  • A commercial tenant or business operator, such as a store, restaurant, or shop that controls its own space, owes its customers the same duty of reasonable care that an owner would.
  • A property management company hired to handle maintenance, inspections, or repairs can share liability when it fails to do that job safely.
  • A co-op board or condo association is generally responsible for the common areas and building systems it controls.
  • A general contractor on a construction site can be liable to both workers and visitors for keeping the site safe.

New York City also has a special rule for sidewalks. Under NYC Administrative Code § 7-210, the abutting property owner, not the City, is generally responsible for injuries caused by a defective sidewalk in front of their property. There's a narrow but important exception. Owner-occupied residential buildings with one to three family units, used exclusively for residential purposes, are not covered by this rule. Liability for those sidewalks can fall back on the City. This rule trips up a lot of injured people who assume the City is always responsible for the sidewalk. Often it isn't.

In one case we handled, a client who fell on a badly damaged sidewalk and needed back and ankle surgery recovered $1,500,000. That result was driven in part by correctly identifying who was responsible for that stretch of pavement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Who is responsible for an injury in a slip and fall case?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney explains how responsibility is determined in a slip and fall case — including how courts look at who owned, occupied, or controlled the property and what duty each party owed to the injured person.

The Four Elements You Must Prove

To win a premises liability claim in New York, you generally have to prove four things.

1. Duty of care. The defendant owed you a legal duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions. Under Basso v. Miller, that duty is reasonable care under the circumstances, and the foreseeability of your presence is central to the analysis.

2. Breach of duty. The defendant failed to meet that duty. A breach usually means one of three things. They created the dangerous condition themselves. Or they had actual notice of it, meaning someone told them or they saw it. Or they had constructive notice, meaning the condition existed long enough that a reasonable owner would have discovered and fixed it. Courts often call this last one the "time element."

3. Causation. The breach directly caused your injury. A hazard that didn't actually cause your fall won't support a claim, even if the property was unsafe in some general way.

4. Damages. You suffered real, measurable harm, such as medical bills, lost income, physical pain, and similar losses.

The constructive-notice element is where many cases are won or lost. A floor that was wet for thirty seconds before someone slipped is legally very different from one that had been wet for hours with no one cleaning it up. Proving how long a condition existed is critical, which is why maintenance logs, surveillance footage, and witness accounts matter so much. In one case, a client slipped on water from a roof leak and required neck and back surgery. That kind of evidence supported an $800,000 recovery, because the leak was the type of condition the owner should have known about and addressed. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

What are the Determining Factors of a Premises Liability Case?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney breaks down the key factors courts consider when evaluating a premises liability case in New York — including foreseeability of harm, notice of the dangerous condition, and how long the hazard existed before the injury.

Special Situations: Trespassers and Children

What happens if you were on the property without permission? The answer depends on who you are.

For adult trespassers, a property owner owes a minimal duty. The owner cannot intentionally or recklessly injure someone, by setting a trap, for instance. But the owner generally has no obligation to make the property safe for people who aren't supposed to be there.

Children are treated differently. New York recognizes that young children can't appreciate danger the way adults can, so the law applies the attractive nuisance doctrine. Say a property has an artificially dangerous condition that foreseeably draws children, like an unfenced swimming pool, abandoned machinery, or an open excavation. The owner may be liable even if the child was technically trespassing. The doctrine generally requires two things. The owner knew or should have known children were likely to enter. And the burden of fixing or guarding the hazard was slight compared to the risk it posed to a child.

This doctrine is fact-specific. It does not mean a child always has a claim simply because they were hurt. But if your child was injured on someone's property, don't assume that trespassing automatically bars recovery. It's worth having a lawyer evaluate the specific facts.

Common Types of Property Owner Liability Cases in New York City

Premises liability covers a wide range of accidents. The most common cases we see involving a property owner for personal injury in New York include:

  • Slip and falls on wet floors, icy walkways, or uneven pavement
  • Trip and falls caused by poor lighting, broken stairs, or cluttered walkways
  • Elevator and escalator accidents
  • Injuries from defective handrails or broken flooring
  • Dog bites. New York imposes strict liability for medical costs once a dog has been declared dangerous under Agriculture & Markets Law § 123, plus general negligence liability when an owner knew of the dog's vicious tendencies
  • Swimming pool accidents from a failure to fence or maintain the pool
  • Negligent security, such as assaults in places where the risk was foreseeable, like apartment lobbies or parking garages
  • Construction-site accidents on or next to a property
What types of Premises Liability Cases have you handled?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney describes the range of premises liability cases the firm has handled — from slip and falls in stores and apartment buildings to elevator accidents, negligent security claims, and construction-site injuries in and around New York City.

Key Deadlines: Don't Wait

New York's deadlines for filing a premises liability claim are strict, and they change depending on who owns the property.

For most claims against private property owners, the statute of limitations is three years from the date of injury, under CPLR § 214.

When the property is owned or operated by the City, the State, or a government agency, the rules are far less forgiving. You generally must file a formal Notice of Claim within 90 days of the injury, as required by General Municipal Law § 50-e. The lawsuit itself must usually be filed within one year and 90 days. Missing that 90-day notice deadline can bar the claim entirely. Courts can sometimes grant permission to file a late notice, but that relief is discretionary and never guaranteed.

There are a few important exceptions to the standard three-year rule:

  • Minors. Under CPLR § 208, the statute of limitations is tolled during the period of infancy. Once the minor turns 18, the standard three-year period begins to run, which typically gives an injured minor until around age 21 to file.
  • Latent injuries. CPLR § 214-c provides a narrow discovery rule for injuries from toxic substances or objects left in the body after surgery. It does not apply to ordinary slip-and-fall cases.

There's also a practical reason not to wait, separate from any legal deadline: evidence disappears fast in New York City. Surveillance footage is frequently overwritten within days, hazards get cleaned up or repaired, and witnesses become hard to track down. The sooner the process starts, the more evidence can be preserved.

Is there a time limit for Premises Liability cases?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney explains the time limits that apply to premises liability cases in New York — including the standard three-year statute of limitations for private property, the critical 90-day Notice of Claim deadline for government-owned property, and why waiting can cost you the evidence you need.

Comparative Fault: Even If You Were Partly to Blame

Many people assume that if they share any blame for their accident, they can't recover anything. In New York, that's not how it works.

New York follows pure comparative negligence under CPLR § 1411. Under this rule, your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault, but you can still recover even if you were mostly responsible. If you're found 70 percent at fault, you can still recover 30 percent of your damages. There's no minimum threshold. In theory, someone 99 percent at fault could still recover 1 percent.

Here's a concrete example. Suppose you slip on a wet floor and a jury finds you 25 percent at fault for not noticing a warning sign. If your total damages come to $200,000, your recovery is reduced by your share of fault, leaving you with $150,000.

Property owners and their insurers regularly argue that the injured person was distracted, wasn't watching where they were going, or wore inappropriate footwear. Those arguments are common, but they don't necessarily defeat a claim. They typically go to the percentage of fault, not whether you can recover at all.

What Compensation Can You Recover?

If your premises liability claim succeeds, the compensation generally falls into two categories.

Economic damages are the calculable, out-of-pocket losses:

  • Past and future medical expenses, including hospital care, surgery, physical therapy, and medication
  • Lost wages and reduced future earning capacity
  • Other out-of-pocket costs, such as transportation to medical appointments and in-home help
  • Property damage, including personal items broken in the fall

Non-economic damages compensate for harms that don't come with a receipt:

Punitive damages are rare in premises liability cases. They're available only when an owner's conduct was willful, wanton, or recklessly indifferent, not for ordinary negligence. Most injured people should not expect them.

One more point worth knowing: New York does not impose a statutory cap on pain and suffering damages in premises liability cases. The amount is decided by a jury based on the severity and permanence of the injury. In one matter we handled, a legally blind man fell sixteen feet into an open elevator shaft and suffered back and heel injuries. He recovered $2,875,000, a reflection of how serious the consequences of a property owner's failure to maintain safe conditions can be. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

What to Do Immediately After a Property Injury in New York

The steps you take in the first hours and days can shape your claim. If you're hurt on someone else's property in New York:

  1. Seek medical attention, even if you feel okay. Some injuries are delayed.
  2. Report the incident to the owner, landlord, or manager, and ask for a written report.
  3. Photograph the hazard, the surrounding scene, and your injuries before anything is cleaned up or changed.
  4. Get the names and contact information of any witnesses.
  5. Don't give a recorded statement to an insurance adjuster before speaking with a lawyer.
  6. Contact a personal injury attorney. The sooner, the better.

Related Questions

What do I have to prove to sue a property owner for personal injury in New York?

You must prove four elements of negligence: that the property owner owed you a duty of care, that they breached it by creating or failing to address a known hazard, that the breach directly caused your injury, and that you suffered actual damages. The breach element often turns on whether the owner had notice of the danger long enough to fix it.

What if the property is owned by the City of New York?

The deadlines tighten significantly. You generally must file a Notice of Claim within 90 days of the injury under General Municipal Law § 50-e, and the lawsuit must usually be filed within one year and 90 days. Missing the notice deadline can end the claim before it starts, so government-property cases are time-sensitive in a way private cases are not.

Can I sue if I was partly at fault for the accident?

Yes. New York's pure comparative negligence rule lets you recover even if you share fault. Your award is reduced by your percentage of responsibility, but there's no threshold that bars recovery. Being partly to blame lowers the amount; it doesn't eliminate the claim.

Do I need a lawyer to sue a property owner in New York?

You're not legally required to have one, but premises liability cases are difficult to prove on your own. Establishing constructive notice, identifying every responsible party, meeting strict deadlines, and countering insurer arguments about fault all take experience. Most reputable firms, including ours, offer a free consultation and work on contingency, so there's no upfront cost to find out where you stand.

What evidence do I need to win a premises liability case in New York?

The strongest cases rely on evidence showing the hazard existed and the owner had time to address it: photos of the condition, surveillance footage, maintenance logs, incident reports, witness statements, and medical records. Footage especially disappears quickly, so preserving evidence early is critical to building a strong claim.


Sources & Official Resources

New York State Laws Cited

  1. CPLR § 214 — Three-Year Statute of Limitations
  2. CPLR § 208 — Tolling for Infancy (Minors)
  3. CPLR § 214-c — Discovery Rule for Latent Toxic Substance Injuries
  4. CPLR § 1411 — Pure Comparative Negligence
  5. General Municipal Law § 50-e — Notice of Claim Requirement
  6. Agriculture & Markets Law § 123 — Dangerous Dogs and Strict Liability

NYC Laws Cited 7. NYC Administrative Code § 7-210 — Sidewalk Liability of Abutting Property Owner

Case Law 8. Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233 (1976) — Reasonable Care Standard for Premises Liability


Contact The Orlow Firm

If you were hurt on someone else's property in New York City, you may have a valid claim, but the deadlines are strict and evidence disappears fast. Understanding your options is an important first step. The Orlow Firm has helped injured New Yorkers throughout Queens, Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx for over 40 years.

Call (646) 647-3398 for a free consultation. We work on contingency, so you pay nothing unless we win. If you can't come to us, we can come to you.

Se Habla Español

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Every case is different. Contact an attorney to discuss your specific situation.

The Following People Contributed to This Page

Loyda Gomez
Written byParalegal & Office ManagerB.A.Sc., Political Science & Government, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), 22+ years at The Orlow Firm, Bilingual: English and Spanish
Adam Orlow
Legally reviewed bySenior Trial PartnerFormer Queens County Bar Association President (2022–2023)

Adam Moses Orlow joined The Orlow Firm after graduating from Yeshiva University's Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and has since become an integral part of the firm's success. Following in his... Read More

Related Articles

Car Accidents

What Is a Notice of Claim?

A notice of claim is a sworn, written document. New York law requires you to serve it on a government entity before you can sue that entity for a personal injury. Under General Municipal Law § 50-e,…

Read More
Premises Liability

Negligent Repair & Maintenance

Plaintiff fell into elevator’s shaft, claimed doors malfunctioned Settlement: $2,875,000 Case: Bruce M v Saunders Apartments, Inc., Vision Enterprise Management, LLC and Skyline Elevators, Inc., No....

Read More

The Orlow Firm’s Results

Notable settlements and verdicts for our clients

$5,000,000

Infant Lead Poisoning - Foster Home

Infant placed in foster home with lead paint developed extremely elevated blood lead levels causing neurological problems.

Lead Poisoning
1 of 14

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Customer reviews on Google

4.9 rating of 59 reviews
Payton Hutchinson

Payton Hutchinson

3 months ago

All my homies love brian and adam! 10/10 recommend for an amazing turnout on your case

Andrew Gantman

Andrew Gantman

5 months ago

Brian and his team made The whole process very easy This is the only law firm I will use

Aiaja Blackwell

Aiaja Blackwell

5 months ago

This Law Firm is 10/10! The staff and most of all the attorney Brian Orlow was very nice, sweet and amazing to work with. They answered all of my questions and handled me with respect and care! If you’re looking for a la…

Maegan Ratliff (maedwellness)

Maegan Ratliff (maedwellness)

a year ago

This firm is top! Everyone is professional, and they actually care. It is a rare combination, but The Orlow Firm has managed to achieve it. They made all the potentially difficult moments easy, and they were always direc…

Michael Foster

Michael Foster

a year ago

They provided me with excellent service.

Christa

Christa

2 years ago

Brian was very helpful when my partner and I got into an accident. He not only guided us through the legal proceedings of the case, but he assisted in referring me to a convenient physical therapist in my area. Accidents…

Miguel Alava

Miguel Alava

2 years ago

The Orlow Firm is the Greatest, most professional law firm in all of New York City and the World. Brian really cares about his clients. He still sends me Birthday Cards yearly after my first case which was 10 years ago…

Kamal Ali

Kamal Ali

2 years ago

Great job. Appreciate your help. Thanks...

matt spiller

matt spiller

2 years ago

Very Professional office , reached a very nice settlement in a short period of time , kept me in the loop during the process. Would highly recommend .

Mirely Nunez

Mirely Nunez

2 years ago

"The process was so easy and the outcome awesome!"

Amira Givens

Amira Givens

2 years ago

This law firm took the time to help me When no one else would . I’m so grateful to them . I recommend them to everyone.

Nichelle B

Nichelle B

3 years ago

Brain was amazing from the start. The process was so easy and the outcome awesome! I had two cases at one time and he handled both. You will be happy to use this office. Professional and curious through and through.

Tanisha Stewart

Tanisha Stewart

3 years ago

So far The Orlow Firm had been the best. On top of everything thing. Thank you for working with me.

DiAnitap. M

DiAnitap. M

4 years ago

Muy excelentes abogados

John Hage

John Hage

5 years ago

Yes I was very impressed with the professionalism and the quality of work done by the Orlow law firm. Especially thanks to Brian and his brother for all the hard work.

David Wilson

David Wilson

8 years ago

I was involved in an accident that left me injured. I wasn't sure what I needed to do so I started Googling around and ended up finding The Orlow Firm. I couldn't be happier with my decision to work with Brian and everyo…

Memberships & Accolades

The Orlow Firm’s Accolades

Founded in 1981, The Orlow Firm has earned many top-level honors for its excellence, compassion, and legal excellence. These recognitions reflect our unwavering commitment to achieving justice, delivering results, and providing compassionate, personalized representation to injury victims in Queens and throughout New York City.

Lawyers.com
Super Lawyers
Justia
Martindale-Hubbell AV Rated
Our Locations

Four offices across New York City.

We offer free initial consultations and operate four offices across New York City for your convenience. We can go to you if you cannot come to us.

We can help you! Request a free consultation.

Contact Us Today

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
Notice: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The Orlow Firm works on a contingent fee basis. A contingent basis means that our attorneys do not charge by consultation but will take a percentage on the amount recovered. This amount is usually one third of the net recovery after disbursement. This means that the cost of hiring The Orlow Firm varies based on the amount recovered.

© 2026 by The Orlow Firm. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms & Conditions.