Queens False Arrest Lawyer

Being detained without probable cause violates your rights under the Constitution. It happens more often than most people think. If you were arrested without legal reason in Queens, you need a Queens false arrest lawyer who knows both federal civil rights claims and New York state tort law. At The Orlow Firm, our Flushing-based attorneys have spent over 40 years holding police officers and the City of New York to account. We handle unlawful arrest cases in Jamaica, Astoria, Far Rockaway, and all of Queens.

Call (646) 647-3398 for a free consultation | Se Habla Español

A false arrest happens when a person is detained or arrested without probable cause or a valid warrant. This violates Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure. Under New York law, false arrest requires that someone assert legal authority. A police officer putting you in handcuffs counts. So does a security guard blocking you from leaving, or anyone else holding you while claiming the right to do so.

False arrest differs from false imprisonment in one key way. False imprisonment covers any unlawful restraint of a person's freedom. False arrest involves someone asserting legal authority they do not have. Both police officers and private parties can commit false arrest. Private parties include store security guards, bouncers, and private citizens making invalid citizen's arrests.

How False Arrest Differs from Malicious Prosecution

This distinction matters. False arrest focuses on the arrest itself, the moment of detention without legal reason. Malicious prosecution, which we address on a separate page, concerns the wrongful continuation of criminal proceedings after arraignment. You can have both claims if you were arrested without probable cause and then prosecuted without basis. But they are separate legal theories with different elements and different filing deadlines. The clock for a false arrest claim starts when you are released from custody. For malicious prosecution, the clock starts when the criminal case is resolved in your favor.

Your Legal Options After a False Arrest in Queens

If you were falsely arrested, you have two main legal paths. A Queens false arrest lawyer will often pursue both at the same time.

Federal Civil Rights Claim (42 U.S.C. Section 1983)

Under Section 1983, you can sue the officer who arrested you, and possibly supervisors, for violating your rights under color of state law. You can recover compensatory damages, punitive damages against the officer, and attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. Section 1988. The filing deadline is three years, and no notice of claim is required.

The main defense officers raise is qualified immunity. They argue they had an "objectively reasonable belief" that probable cause existed. Brian and Adam Orlow are both admitted to the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY). This gives the firm the ability to file Section 1983 claims in federal court.

New York State Common Law Claim

Under state law, you can sue both the officer and the City of New York through respondeat superior, which means vicarious liability. The filing deadline is one year for intentional torts. But you must first file a notice of claim within 90 days of your release from custody under General Municipal Law Section 50-e.

The notice must include your name and address, the nature of your claim, when and where the incident happened, and the injuries you suffered.

Municipal Liability and the Monell Doctrine

Under Section 1983, the City of New York can only be held liable if the false arrest resulted from an official policy or custom. Vicarious liability alone is not enough. But under state law, vicarious liability does apply. This makes it possible to hold the city directly responsible for its officers' actions. This is one of the strategic reasons many false arrest attorneys pursue both routes.

Police Misconduct and False Arrests in Queens

False arrest is not an isolated problem. It is a documented, measurable pattern in Queens. NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) data reveals the scope of police misconduct across the borough.

Our analysis of CCRB records shows Queens recorded 22,104 civilian complaints against police officers between 2000 and 2025. "Abuse of Authority," the CCRB category that includes false arrests, unlawful stops, and unlawful searches, accounts for 53.1% of all Queens allegations. That is 16,257 out of 30,657 total allegations. "Threat of arrest" alone produced 1,900 allegations, making it the third most common allegation type in the borough.

Precinct-Level Patterns

The 103rd Precinct, covering Jamaica, Hollis, and St. Albans, leads all Queens precincts with 2,709 complaints and 3,841 allegations. The 113th Precinct in South Jamaica and Springfield Gardens ranks second with 2,209 complaints. Together, these two Southeast Queens precincts account for 22.2% of all Queens police misconduct complaints. The 109th Precinct near our Flushing office recorded 1,191 complaints.

Racial Disparities and Accountability Gaps

Our review of CCRB victim data found that 42.6% of Queens police misconduct allegations involve Black residents. Black residents make up about 19% of Queens' population according to the 2020 Census. Only 6.1% of Queens complaints were substantiated (1,357 of 22,104). Substantiation rates have risen from about 3.2% in the 2000-2010 period to roughly 11.8% in 2024. Even when complaints are substantiated, 24.6% result in no penalty. Only 27 officers citywide (0.2%) were terminated.

The Cost of Police Misconduct

According to ABC7 New York, NYC paid $206.4 million in NYPD misconduct settlements in 2024 and over $117 million in 2025. The Washington Times reported in March 2026 that total police misconduct payouts topped nearly $800 million over seven years. These numbers represent taxpayer dollars spent because officers violated the rights of people they were sworn to protect.

Critical Deadlines for Queens False Arrest Claims

The most urgent deadline in a Queens false arrest case is the 90-day notice of claim. Miss it and you may lose your right to sue the City of New York entirely.

90-Day Notice of Claim (State Claims Against NYC)

Under General Municipal Law Section 50-e, you must file a notice of claim within 90 days of your release from custody. Note: the clock starts on your release date, not the date of arrest. The notice must include your name and address, what your claim is about, when and where the incident occurred, and what injuries you suffered. After filing, there is a 30-day waiting period before you can start a lawsuit.

One-Year Statute of Limitations (State Intentional Tort)

For state false arrest claims, the deadline is one year from your release from custody. Under GML Section 50-i, you must start the action within one year and 90 days from the incident.

Three-Year Statute of Limitations (Federal Section 1983)

Federal civil rights claims carry a three-year deadline. No notice of claim is required. The clock starts from the date of the arrest itself.

How False Arrest Deadlines Differ from Malicious Prosecution

For malicious prosecution, the clock starts when your criminal case ends in your favor, through an acquittal, dismissal, or dropped charges. For false arrest, the clock starts when you are released from custody. These are different dates. You may be too late for one claim but not the other. This is one reason why contacting a Queens false arrest lawyer right after release protects both potential claims.

How a Queens False Arrest Lawyer Builds a Strong Case

The central question in every false arrest case is simple: did the officer have probable cause to arrest you? If the answer is no, you have a false arrest claim.

Probable cause means "sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed." It is a lower bar than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. But it is not a hunch, a suspicion, or a gut feeling. When warrantless arrests are based on informant tips or hearsay, probable cause is tested under the Aguilar-Spinelli test. This test looks at both the basis of the informant's knowledge and their reliability.

Steven S. Orlow, Founder of The Orlow Firm, served as an Assistant District Attorney in Kings County before entering private practice. He understands probable cause from the prosecution's side, and he knows when corners are cut and when arrests lack proper backing.

Evidence to Preserve

Strong false arrest cases rely on documentation. Key evidence includes body-worn camera footage, cell phone video from bystanders, witness statements, and medical records from any injuries during the arrest. You should also preserve the arrest report (UF-61), the criminal complaint, and stop-and-frisk reports (UF-250). Note: our analysis of CCRB data shows 90.1% of Queens complaints lack BWC evidence.

Signs Your Arrest Lacked Probable Cause

Several outcomes suggest an arrest was made without probable cause. Charges were dismissed. The DA declined to prosecute. Charges were cut down. You were acquitted at trial. An Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD) may complicate a false arrest claim, though this issue is more directly tied to malicious prosecution. If any of these apply, talk to a Queens false arrest lawyer about your options.

Compensation in Queens False Arrest Cases

Compensatory Damages

You can recover lost wages for the time you spent in custody. You can also recover medical expenses if you were injured during the arrest. And you can recover the costs of your criminal defense, including attorney's fees you paid to fight charges that should never have been brought.

Pain and Suffering

False arrest causes harm beyond the financial. Emotional distress, humiliation, damage to your reputation, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and the impact on your family are all compensable. The length of your detention, how severe the charges were, and whether force was used during the arrest all affect the value of these damages. A Queens false arrest civil rights attorney can help calculate the full scope of your losses.

Punitive Damages and Attorney's Fees

Under Section 1983, punitive damages are available if the officer acted with reckless disregard for your rights. These damages are meant to punish and deter, not just compensate. Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1988, the prevailing party can also recover attorney's fees, a major advantage over state tort claims.

For context, NYC paid $206.4 million in NYPD misconduct settlements in 2024 across hundreds of cases. Individual false arrest settlements range from several thousand dollars to over $500,000 depending on the facts, with wrongful conviction cases reaching multi-million-dollar settlements. The Orlow Firm works on contingency. You pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Our Results in Police Misconduct Cases

$275,000 — Parking attendant assaulted and falsely arrested by police; required shoulder surgery.

$150,000 — False arrest of a probation officer, demonstrating that even law enforcement professionals can be targeted by unlawful police conduct.

$200,000 — Teenager kicked in the face by NYPD officers; required jaw fracture surgery. False arrest and excessive force often occur together.

$150,000 — Grandfather assaulted by NYPD at a family gathering; required knee surgery.

$100,000 — Assaulted by NYPD during a traffic stop; sustained knee injury. Traffic stops are one of the most common settings for false arrest in Queens, where traffic stops increased about 35% from 2023 to 2024.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Queens False Arrest Lawyer FAQ

Can I sue for false arrest if I was guilty of a different crime?

Yes. Probable cause must exist for the specific crime you were arrested for. If an officer arrested you for one offense but only had evidence of a different crime, the arrest for the original charge may still count as a false arrest. Each charge requires its own probable cause finding.

What if the police planted evidence during my arrest?

Evidence fabrication makes a false arrest case much stronger. Planted evidence can support claims beyond false arrest, including malicious prosecution and civil rights violations under Section 1983. These cases often carry higher damages, including punitive damages, because they show deliberate misconduct rather than a mistake.

Can I file a false arrest claim if I resisted arrest?

It depends on the facts. CCRB data shows 2.7% of Queens complaints involved arrests for resisting arrest, a charge often added after the fact. If the initial arrest lacked probable cause, any resistance to that unlawful arrest may be viewed differently by the court. The details matter, and an experienced attorney can evaluate whether resistance affects your claim.

Do I need to wait for my criminal case to end before suing for false arrest?

Unlike malicious prosecution, false arrest claims can be filed while criminal charges are still pending because the claim challenges the arrest itself, not the prosecution. But there are strategic reasons to wait. A dismissal or acquittal makes your case much stronger. An ongoing prosecution creates problems.

Can a store or private security guard falsely arrest me?

Yes. New York law holds private parties liable for false arrest when they detain someone without proper reason. The "shopkeeper's privilege" gives merchants a limited defense when they detain suspected shoplifters in a reasonable way. But going beyond those limits, using too much force, holding someone too long, or acting without reasonable suspicion, creates liability.

What is qualified immunity and can it block my false arrest case?

Qualified immunity protects officers from personal liability. It applies if they can show their actions were "objectively reasonable," even if probable cause did not actually exist. It is the most common defense in Section 1983 cases. But qualified immunity is not absolute. If the officer's conduct violated clearly established rights under the Constitution, the defense fails.

How long does a false arrest lawsuit take in New York?

Most false arrest cases in New York take one to three years to resolve. Cases settled before trial resolve faster. Cases that go to court take longer. Federal Section 1983 claims and state tort claims may move on different timelines. The strength of evidence, how complex the case is, and whether the city will negotiate all affect how long it takes.

Can I get my arrest record sealed after a false arrest?

Yes. Under New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 160.50, if your case ends in a dismissal, acquittal, or other favorable result, you can have your arrest record sealed. Sealing removes the record from public databases, though certain law enforcement agencies may keep limited access. Your attorney can file the sealing request as part of your case resolution.

Contact a Queens False Arrest Lawyer Today

If you were arrested without probable cause in Queens, the clock is already running on your right to file a claim. The 90-day notice of claim deadline does not wait, and neither should you.

The Orlow Firm has protected the rights of Queens residents for over 40 years from our main office at 71-18 Main Street in Flushing. Adam Moses Orlow, Managing Partner and former President of the Queens County Bar Association, leads the firm. Steven S. Orlow, Founder and former Assistant District Attorney, brings courtroom experience and deep community ties to every case.

Call (646) 647-3398 for a free consultation. We work on contingency. You pay nothing unless we win your case. We can come to you if you cannot come to us.

Se Habla Español | Four NYC office locations | Free consultation

Sources & Official Resources

Federal Laws Cited

1. 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 -- Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
2. 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 -- Attorney's Fees in Civil Rights Cases
3. Fourth Amendment -- U.S. Constitution

New York State Laws Cited

4. GML Section 50-e -- Notice of Claim Requirements
5. GML Section 50-i -- Presentation of Tort Claims; Commencement of Actions
6. CPLR Section 215 -- One-Year Statute of Limitations for Intentional Torts
7. CPL Section 160.50 -- Sealing of Arrest Records Upon Favorable Termination

Statistics Sources

8. NYC CCRB Complaint Data (NYC Open Data)
9. NYC CCRB Allegations Data (NYC Open Data)
10. NYC CCRB Penalties Data (NYC Open Data)

Helpful Resources

11. NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board -- File a Complaint

Data Methodology Borough and neighborhood breakdowns were calculated by The Orlow Firm's research team from publicly available NYC Open Data records. CCRB complaint data (Civilian Complaint Review Board, 2000-2025) is published at the complaint and allegation level with precinct identifiers. We aggregated these records to produce the Queens-specific and precinct-level statistics cited above, as the CCRB does not publish pre-calculated borough-level breakdowns for all metrics.