Skip to main content

Top 5 OSHA Violations on Construction Sites in New York

Call Now to Request a Free Consultation (646) 647-3398

The Following People Contributed to This Page

Loyda Gomez
Written byLoyda GomezParalegal & Office ManagerB.A.Sc., Political Science & Government, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), 22+ years at The Orlow Firm, Bilingual: English and Spanish
Adam Orlow
Legally reviewed byAdam OrlowSenior Trial PartnerFormer Queens County Bar Association President (2022–2023)

Updated: July 12, 2026 · 15 min read

The five most frequently cited OSHA violations on New York construction sites are inadequate fall protection (29 C.F.R. § 1926.501), improper ladder use (§ 1926.1053), missing fall-protection training (§ 1926.503), unsafe scaffolding (§ 1926.451), and lack of eye and face protection (§ 1926.102). Together, these five standards account for most federal construction citations issued each year.

In 2025, New York City construction injuries hit a 10-year low. According to the NYC Department of Buildings (DOB), construction-related injuries fell 33 percent to 320, the lowest figure on record. Total incidents dropped to 432, down from 638 the year before. Yet over the same period, construction fatalities rose. Fewer workers were hurt, but more workers died.

That paradox has a simple explanation. The safety failures that kill people are still happening at an alarming scale. Falls remain the leading cause of both injuries and deaths on construction sites across all five boroughs. The OSHA violations that lead to those falls are cited thousands of times every year.

This post breaks down the top five OSHA violations on construction sites in New York. It covers what each rule actually requires and why these failures keep happening in New York City. Most important for injured workers, it explains what rights you have under New York law when a safety violation plays a role in an accident.

What are some of the construction site laws in New York City?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney explains the construction site laws that apply specifically in New York City, including Labor Law 240 and 241, and how they protect injured workers beyond federal OSHA standards.

Why OSHA Violations Matter Differently in New York

OSHA is the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration. It sets the minimum safety standards that apply to construction sites nationwide. When an employer violates an OSHA standard, OSHA can issue citations, impose fines, and open investigations. But here is the part many injured workers do not realize. An OSHA citation by itself does not automatically win a civil lawsuit. And you do not need OSHA to cite your employer to have a viable injury claim.

New York gives construction workers protections that go well beyond the federal floor. A worker injured because of a safety failure can pursue a civil lawsuit under New York Labor Law § 240 or § 241(6). This claim exists separately from, and on top of, workers' compensation benefits.

Under New York Labor Law § 240, often called the Scaffold Law, owners and general contractors face absolute liability for gravity-related injuries. That covers falls from height and being struck by falling objects, when proper safety devices were not provided. A § 240 claim does not require you to prove an OSHA violation at all. Labor Law § 241(6) takes a different route. It requires compliance with the specific safety rules in New York's Industrial Code, and a violation of one of those concrete provisions can establish negligence.

This is where OSHA evidence becomes powerful. OSHA findings do not create automatic civil liability in New York. But an OSHA citation, inspection report, or a "willful" or "repeat" violation finding is important documentation in a Labor Law claim. It helps establish the factual record of what went wrong and how. So if OSHA did cite your employer, that evidence strengthens your case. Its absence does not sink it.

Why Are Construction Laws Strict in NYC?
What's in this video?

This video explains why New York City imposes some of the strictest construction safety laws in the country, including the Scaffold Law's absolute liability standard and how it differs from federal OSHA rules.

Violation #1: Inadequate Fall Protection (29 C.F.R. § 1926.501)

Fall protection has been OSHA's single most cited construction standard for 15 consecutive years, and it is not close. In federal fiscal year 2025, OSHA recorded 6,757 fall-protection citations in the construction industry. That is more than double the next most-cited standard.

29 C.F.R. § 1926.501 generally requires fall protection whenever a worker is exposed to a fall of six feet or more to a lower level. Employers can satisfy the rule through guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems (PFAS), depending on the work. The standard also requires covers over floor and roof openings and guardrails on scaffold platforms.

The New York snapshot is stark. Falls remain the leading cause of construction fatalities and injuries citywide. Manhattan alone accounted for 148 incidents in 2025, the most of any borough, according to DOB data. When a worker falls from height because fall protection was missing or defective, the legal stakes are significant. A fall from a height is precisely the scenario Labor Law § 240 was written to address. An employer's failure to provide adequate fall protection can give rise to an absolute-liability claim against the owner and general contractor. That claim is separate from any workers' compensation benefits.

Violation #2: Unsafe Scaffolding (29 C.F.R. § 1926.451)

Scaffolding citations stand out in the 2025 data for one reason. They went up. Most top construction violations declined year over year. Scaffolding was the only category in the top group to increase, rising to 2,155 citations in fiscal year 2025 from 1,873 the year before.

29 C.F.R. § 1926.451 sets detailed requirements for scaffolds. Each scaffold must support at least four times its maximum intended load. Platforms must be fully planked, and footing must be sound and rigid. Workers on scaffolds more than 10 feet above a lower level generally need guardrails or personal fall arrest systems. A competent person must inspect the scaffold before each work shift.

In a city built vertically, scaffolds are everywhere, and the DOB regularly issues stop-work orders for scaffold deficiencies. In one widely reported February 2025 incident near Columbus Circle, a window-washing platform malfunction left workers in a frightening high-rise situation. The event drew citywide attention to suspended-scaffold safety.

Scaffold defects sit squarely within New York's strongest worker protections. A fall from a scaffold is a gravity-related injury that can trigger Labor Law § 240. The New York Industrial Code (Subpart 23-5) governs scaffolds in extensive detail, which opens the door to a § 241(6) claim as well. The Orlow Firm has handled scaffolding accident cases resulting in recoveries ranging from $400,000 to more than $2.1 million.

Injured in a scaffolding accident?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney discusses what injured construction workers should do after a scaffolding accident, including how to preserve their rights under Labor Law 240 and what a scaffolding injury claim involves.

Violation #3: Improper Ladder Use (29 C.F.R. § 1926.1053)

Ladders were the second most cited construction-specific standard in fiscal year 2025, with 2,755 citations. They are the most ordinary piece of equipment on a job site, and that familiarity is part of the problem.

29 C.F.R. § 1926.1053 sets clear rules for ladders. They must support at least four times their maximum intended load. They must be kept clean and free of defects, and set up at a safe angle. A competent person must inspect ladders for visible defects on a periodic basis. Damaged ladders must be immediately tagged and withdrawn from service until repaired.

Ladder falls fold into the broader fall statistics that the DOB identifies as the leading cause of construction injuries. The most recent granular DOB breakdown available showed ladder, stair, and trip-related incidents climbing in earlier reporting years. An earlier enforcement action at 151 West 30th Street resulted in a $25,000 DOB penalty tied to ladder-related deficiencies.

The outcomes of ladder falls can be life-altering. The Orlow Firm recovered $3,375,000 for a construction worker who fell 12 feet off a ladder and required neck and back surgery. The firm also recovered $3,000,000 for a worker who fell from a ladder and fractured his femur, also requiring back surgery. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

From a legal standpoint, ladder falls frequently invoke Labor Law § 240. New York courts have repeatedly held that a worker who falls because a ladder was unsecured, defective, or otherwise inadequate can have a § 240 claim. This holds true even when the fall is from a relatively modest height. The law focuses on whether proper protection against a gravity-related risk was provided.

Violation #4: Inadequate Fall-Protection Training (29 C.F.R. § 1926.503)

Equipment is only as safe as the worker using it, which is why training is its own cited standard. OSHA recorded 2,163 fall-protection training citations in the construction industry in fiscal year 2025, the third most among construction-specific standards.

29 C.F.R. § 1926.503 requires that a competent person train each worker who might be exposed to fall hazards. Training must cover hazard recognition, the correct use of personal fall arrest systems and other protective equipment, and the procedures for minimizing those hazards. Employers must keep written certification of the training. They must also retrain workers when conditions change or when a worker shows they have not retained the material.

New York City layers an even stricter requirement on top of the federal rule. Under Local Law 196, most construction workers must hold a 40-hour Site Safety Training (SST) card, and supervisors must hold a 62-hour card. The DOB enforces these requirements with civil penalties of $5,000 or more per untrained worker. That makes training failures both a safety problem and a direct compliance liability in the city.

The danger of fraudulent training came into sharp focus in a 2024 New York case. Prosecutors charged a security company over a sham safety-training operation tied to a fatal outcome. It is a reminder that a valid card on paper means nothing if the training behind it never happened. When a worker is hurt because they were never properly trained, the lack of training matters legally. It can support a § 241(6) claim through specific Industrial Code provisions and strengthen a general negligence case.

Violation #5: Missing Eye and Face Protection (29 C.F.R. § 1926.102)

Rounding out the top five, eye and face protection drew 1,925 construction citations in fiscal year 2025. Like scaffolding, it was one of the few categories to increase year over year.

29 C.F.R. § 1926.102 requires employers to provide eye and face protection that meets the ANSI Z87.1 standard. This applies whenever workers face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, chemicals, or harmful light. Impact protection generally requires side shields, and the equipment must be maintained in good condition. Employers must also accommodate workers who wear prescription lenses.

The DOB does not publish eye-injury statistics at a granular level. But the broader 2025 figures provide the current benchmark for construction harm in the city: 320 injuries across 432 incidents. The consequences of missing eye protection can be devastating and permanent. A 2024 medical case report documented a serious nail-gun eye injury, illustrating how quickly an unprotected eye can suffer irreversible damage on a job site.

Legally, a PPE failure can support several theories at once. One is general negligence. Another is a claim under Labor Law § 200, which requires owners and contractors to provide a reasonably safe place to work. A third is a § 241(6) claim if a specific Industrial Code PPE provision was violated. It is also worth knowing a basic workers' right: employers must provide required personal protective equipment at no cost to the worker.

How to Report Construction Site Safety Violations in NYC

If you see a dangerous condition on a construction site in New York, you can act. Federal law protects you for doing so.

Start by documenting the hazard with photos and notes, but only if you can do so safely. Report the problem to your supervisor first. If it is not addressed, escalate to OSHA. You can file a complaint online at osha.gov, by phone, or by mail, and you can request that your complaint remain anonymous. In New York City, you can also report dangerous construction conditions to the DOB by calling 311 or using the DOB NOW portal.

Section 11(c) of the OSH Act prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who report safety violations. Firing, demoting, or otherwise punishing a worker for filing a complaint is itself illegal. And do not wait. OSHA prioritizes time-sensitive hazards, and a fast report can prevent the next injury.

What should you do if you were involved in a construction accident in New York?
What's in this video?

This video outlines the steps an injured construction worker should take immediately after an accident in New York, from reporting the injury to understanding their rights under workers' compensation and Labor Law.

Frequently Asked Questions About OSHA Construction Site Violations in New York

What is OSHA and why does it matter on construction sites?

OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, is the federal agency that sets and enforces workplace safety standards. On construction sites, OSHA's rules establish the minimum requirements for fall protection, scaffolding, ladders, training, and protective equipment. Violations can lead to fines and investigations. They also create a documented record that can support an injured worker's claim.

What are the most common OSHA violations on NYC construction sites?

The most frequently cited construction violations are inadequate fall protection, improper ladder use, missing fall-protection training, unsafe scaffolding, and lack of eye and face protection. Fall protection alone accounts for more than 6,700 citations a year nationally. That is more than double any other standard.

Can I sue my employer for an OSHA violation?

In New York, you generally cannot sue your direct employer for a personal injury. Workers' compensation is usually your exclusive remedy against an employer. But you may be able to bring a separate third-party lawsuit against the property owner, general contractor, or other parties under Labor Law § 240 or § 241(6). An OSHA violation can serve as supporting evidence in that case.

What is New York Labor Law 240, and how does it relate to OSHA?

Labor Law § 240, the Scaffold Law, imposes absolute liability on owners and general contractors for gravity-related injuries. That covers falls from height or being struck by falling objects, when proper safety devices were not provided. A § 240 claim does not require an OSHA violation, but OSHA citations and inspection findings can reinforce the factual record of how the accident happened.

What should I do if I was hurt on a construction site in New York?

Seek medical care immediately, report the injury to your supervisor, and document everything you can. That includes the scene, the equipment involved, and the names of any witnesses. Preserve any photos. Because construction claims involve overlapping workers' compensation and Labor Law issues, speaking with an attorney early helps protect both your health and your legal options.

Can undocumented workers file claims for construction injuries in New York?

Yes. Undocumented workers have the same rights under New York Labor Law and the workers' compensation system as documented workers. Immigration status does not bar a construction injury claim, and a worker's status cannot be used to deny the protections of § 240 or § 241(6). The Orlow Firm has recovered significant settlements for undocumented workers injured on scaffolds and at construction sites.

Can Illegal Aliens Working In Construction Sue For Their Injuries?
What's in this video?

An Orlow Firm attorney explains that undocumented workers have the same rights as documented workers under New York Labor Law and the workers' compensation system, and can file claims for construction injuries regardless of immigration status.

What is the difference between an OSHA violation and a Labor Law 240 claim?

An OSHA violation is a federal regulatory finding that can result in fines against an employer. A Labor Law § 240 claim is a New York civil lawsuit that an injured worker brings to recover compensation for their injuries. They are separate systems. OSHA enforces safety rules, while § 240 lets an injured worker hold owners and contractors financially responsible for a gravity-related accident.


Sources & Official Resources

Federal OSHA Standards Cited

  1. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501 — Duty to Have Fall Protection
  2. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.451 — Scaffolding General Requirements
  3. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.1053 — Ladders
  4. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.503 — Fall Protection Training Requirements
  5. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.102 — Eye and Face Protection

New York Laws Cited 6. New York Labor Law § 240 — Scaffolding and Devices for Use of Employees (Scaffold Law) 7. New York Labor Law § 241 — Construction, Excavation and Demolition Work 8. New York Labor Law § 200 — General Duty to Protect Health and Safety

Statistics Sources 9. OSHA Frequently Cited Standards — Construction Industry (NAICS 23), FY2025 10. OSHA Top 10 Most Frequently Cited Standards

NYC Agency Resources 11. NYC Department of Buildings — Construction Related Accident Reports 12. NYC DOB — Site Safety Training (SST) Card Information — Local Law 196

Whistleblower Protection 13. OSHA Section 11(c) — Whistleblower Protection Program


Contact The Orlow Firm

If you were hurt on a construction site and believe a safety violation played a role, understanding your options is only the first step. New York gives injured construction workers protections that go far beyond workers' compensation. The difference between a workers' comp claim alone and a full Labor Law case can be substantial. The Orlow Firm has protected injured workers throughout Queens and across New York City since 1982.

Call (646) 647-3398 for a free consultation. We work on contingency. You pay nothing unless we win. If you cannot come to us, we can come to you.

Se Habla Español

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Every case is different. Contact an attorney to discuss your specific situation.

The Following People Contributed to This Page

Loyda Gomez
Written byParalegal & Office ManagerB.A.Sc., Political Science & Government, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), 22+ years at The Orlow Firm, Bilingual: English and Spanish
Adam Orlow
Legally reviewed bySenior Trial PartnerFormer Queens County Bar Association President (2022–2023)

Adam Moses Orlow joined The Orlow Firm after graduating from Yeshiva University's Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and has since become an integral part of the firm's success. Following in his... Read More

Related Articles

The Orlow Firm’s Results

Notable settlements and verdicts for our clients

$5,000,000

Infant Lead Poisoning - Foster Home

Infant placed in foster home with lead paint developed extremely elevated blood lead levels causing neurological problems.

Lead Poisoning
1 of 14

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Customer reviews on Google

4.9 rating of 59 reviews
Payton Hutchinson

Payton Hutchinson

3 months ago

All my homies love brian and adam! 10/10 recommend for an amazing turnout on your case

Andrew Gantman

Andrew Gantman

5 months ago

Brian and his team made The whole process very easy This is the only law firm I will use

Aiaja Blackwell

Aiaja Blackwell

5 months ago

This Law Firm is 10/10! The staff and most of all the attorney Brian Orlow was very nice, sweet and amazing to work with. They answered all of my questions and handled me with respect and care! If you’re looking for a la…

Maegan Ratliff (maedwellness)

Maegan Ratliff (maedwellness)

a year ago

This firm is top! Everyone is professional, and they actually care. It is a rare combination, but The Orlow Firm has managed to achieve it. They made all the potentially difficult moments easy, and they were always direc…

Michael Foster

Michael Foster

a year ago

They provided me with excellent service.

Christa

Christa

2 years ago

Brian was very helpful when my partner and I got into an accident. He not only guided us through the legal proceedings of the case, but he assisted in referring me to a convenient physical therapist in my area. Accidents…

Miguel Alava

Miguel Alava

2 years ago

The Orlow Firm is the Greatest, most professional law firm in all of New York City and the World. Brian really cares about his clients. He still sends me Birthday Cards yearly after my first case which was 10 years ago…

Kamal Ali

Kamal Ali

2 years ago

Great job. Appreciate your help. Thanks...

matt spiller

matt spiller

2 years ago

Very Professional office , reached a very nice settlement in a short period of time , kept me in the loop during the process. Would highly recommend .

Mirely Nunez

Mirely Nunez

2 years ago

"The process was so easy and the outcome awesome!"

Amira Givens

Amira Givens

2 years ago

This law firm took the time to help me When no one else would . I’m so grateful to them . I recommend them to everyone.

Nichelle B

Nichelle B

3 years ago

Brain was amazing from the start. The process was so easy and the outcome awesome! I had two cases at one time and he handled both. You will be happy to use this office. Professional and curious through and through.

Tanisha Stewart

Tanisha Stewart

3 years ago

So far The Orlow Firm had been the best. On top of everything thing. Thank you for working with me.

DiAnitap. M

DiAnitap. M

4 years ago

Muy excelentes abogados

John Hage

John Hage

5 years ago

Yes I was very impressed with the professionalism and the quality of work done by the Orlow law firm. Especially thanks to Brian and his brother for all the hard work.

David Wilson

David Wilson

8 years ago

I was involved in an accident that left me injured. I wasn't sure what I needed to do so I started Googling around and ended up finding The Orlow Firm. I couldn't be happier with my decision to work with Brian and everyo…

Memberships & Accolades

The Orlow Firm’s Accolades

Founded in 1981, The Orlow Firm has earned many top-level honors for its excellence, compassion, and legal excellence. These recognitions reflect our unwavering commitment to achieving justice, delivering results, and providing compassionate, personalized representation to injury victims in Queens and throughout New York City.

Lawyers.com
Super Lawyers
Justia
Martindale-Hubbell AV Rated
Our Locations

Four offices across New York City.

We offer free initial consultations and operate four offices across New York City for your convenience. We can go to you if you cannot come to us.

We can help you! Request a free consultation.

Contact Us Today

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
Notice: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The Orlow Firm works on a contingent fee basis. A contingent basis means that our attorneys do not charge by consultation but will take a percentage on the amount recovered. This amount is usually one third of the net recovery after disbursement. This means that the cost of hiring The Orlow Firm varies based on the amount recovered.

© 2026 by The Orlow Firm. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms & Conditions.